---
title: "Assess SAP Data Processes: A Data Maturity Assessment Guide"
description: See how a data maturity assessment evaluates SAP processes across five areas, from ownership and preparation to validation, execution, and improvement.
---

<https://migravion.com>

[Free Trial](https://migravion.com/free-trial)

[Customer Portal](https://migravion.com/tickets-view) [Free Trial](https://migravion.com/free-trial) [Free Trial](https://migravion.com/free-trial)

[\< Back](https://migravion.com/blog)

[Home \>](https://migravion.com/) [Blog \>](https://migravion.com/blog) Article

Share

[![Share on Facebook](https://migravion.com/hubfs/facebook-icon.svg)](http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmigravion.com%2Fblog%2Fdata-operations-maturity-assessment-guide%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dfacebook) [![Share on LinkedIn](https://static.hubspot.com/final/img/common/icons/social/linkedin-24x24.png)](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmigravion.com%2Fblog%2Fdata-operations-maturity-assessment-guide%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dlinkedin) [![Share on Twitter](https://static.hubspot.com/final/img/common/icons/social/twitter-24x24.png)](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fmigravion.com%2Fblog%2Fdata-operations-maturity-assessment-guide%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dtwitter&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmigravion.com%2Fblog%2Fdata-operations-maturity-assessment-guide%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dtwitter&source=tweetbutton&text=Assess%20SAP%20Data%20Processes%3A%20A%20Data%20Maturity%20Assessment%20Guide)

 Nov 13, 2026

|

 34 min

 Table of contents:

See how a data maturity assessment evaluates SAP processes across five areas, from ownership and preparation to validation, execution, and improvement.

# Data Maturity Assessment: How to Assess SAP Data Processes

A data maturity assessment helps an organization understand how consistently it manages, governs, and uses data — and where it should focus improvement efforts. Depending on its scope, an assessment may examine strategy, [governance](https://migravion.com/blog/sap-master-data-governance-with-migravion), people, architecture, [data quality](https://migravion.com/solutions/data-quality), operations, and other parts of the data lifecycle.

Streamline Your SAP Data Management with Migravion

[Free Trial](https://migravion.com/free-trial)

Request a Demo

 Get a personal walkthrough from one of our product specialists to explore Migravion’s key features:

 Built-in Source and Target Connectors

 Robust Data Transformations

 Zero-coding

 Flexible Deployment: On-prem, Cloud, and Hybrid

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA, the [Google Privacy Policy](https://policies.google.com/privacy) and   
[Terms of Service](https://policies.google.com/terms) apply.

Reach out to us for a personalized demo and answers to any questions you have.

By clicking on the button above I agree with processing of my personal data for the purposes specified in the [Privacy Policy](https://migravion.com/privacy-policy).

This guide focuses on one part of that broader picture: the maturity of recurring SAP data processes. It looks at how teams request, prepare, approve, execute, and validate data changes, as well as how they handle exceptions and improve the process over time.

The distinction matters. An assessment of SAP data operations can help an organization understand whether its recurring data processes are controlled and repeatable. It does not provide a complete picture of the organization’s data strategy, governance model, analytics capabilities, or all the other aspects of data maturity.

## What a Data Maturity Assessment Evaluates

A data maturity assessment provides a structured way to examine current practices and identify opportunities to improve them. It can cover an organization’s full data environment or focus on a particular function, domain, or process.

A broad assessment might examine whether an organization has a data strategy, clear ownership, suitable technology, documented policies, reliable data, and the skills needed to effectively use data. A narrower assessment might focus on how a team [maintains master data](https://migravion.com/blog/sap-master-data-maintenance-guide), handles data requests, or validates updates before they affect business operations.

The scope determines which questions to ask and what the results can reasonably show. An organization-wide assessment may help leaders understand its [overall data capabilities](https://migravion.com/blog/data-readiness-assessment-guide). A process-level assessment can provide more detail about how specific work is performed, where controls are applied, and where recurring problems arise.

Neither scope is automatically better. The assessment should match the decision it is meant to support. If the question is whether the organization has a coordinated data strategy, assess the strategy and governance. If the question is whether recurring SAP data changes are handled consistently, assess the process that manages those changes.

## Data Maturity, Process Maturity, and Data Quality

These concepts are closely connected, and often discussed together, because they all relate to how an organization manages and works with data.

Yet, each provides a distinct perspective on its current practices:

- **Data maturity** is the broader picture of how an organization manages and uses data. It can include strategy, governance, skills, architecture, data quality, and operational practices.
- **Process maturity** concerns how consistently a specific type of work is performed. For [SAP data operations](https://migravion.com/blog/sap-dataops-best-practices), this includes how changes are requested, prepared, approved, executed, checked, and recorded.
- **Data quality** describes characteristics of the data itself, such as whether it is complete, accurate, consistent, or suitable for its intended use. A process can include [data quality checks](https://migravion.com/blog/data-quality-testing), but a process maturity assessment examines whether those checks and other process steps are defined and applied reliably.

For example, an organization may discover invalid values in SAP data. A [data quality assessment](https://migravion.com/blog/data-readiness-assessment-guide) might measure how many records are affected and where the issue is concentrated. A process maturity assessment might examine whether teams check for invalid values before execution, assign exceptions to an owner, and address recurring causes.

Together, these views can help an organization understand both the condition of its data and the processes that create, change, and maintain it.

## What SAP Data Operations Include

SAP data operations are recurring activities that maintain, update, transfer, or [validate data in SAP](https://migravion.com/solutions/data-quality/data-validation) and connected systems. They may include bulk changes, routine [master data updates](https://migravion.com/blog/sap-customer-master-mass-update-validation), recurring integrations, and other processes that move information between teams or applications.

![Data change process diagram\_11zon](https://migravion.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Data%20change%20process%20diagram_11zon.webp?width=1672&height=941&name=Data%20change%20process%20diagram_11zon.webp)

A typical operation has several stages: a business user submits a request; someone confirms its scope and approval, prepares the data, runs the change, checks the outcome, and records any exceptions. Depending on the organization, different people or teams may be responsible for each stage.

The work may be performed through different tools or SAP interfaces, but the process still needs to define clear responsibilities and controls. A process can involve [automation](https://migravion.com/solutions/master-data-management/data-pipeline-automation) and still have unclear ownership. It can also be carefully documented, but depend on manual steps that are difficult to repeat. Maturity describes how well an organization’s process supports reliable outcomes.

## Why Assess SAP Data Process Maturity

SAP data processes often cross business and technical responsibilities. A change may begin with a business request, require preparation by a data specialist, need approval from an owner, and depend on a technical team for execution. If handoffs are unclear or checks differ between teams, problems can be difficult to prevent and investigate.

An assessment gives teams a structured way to examine these issues. Instead of relying on general impressions, like “the process is too manual,” they can ask more specific questions, such as:

- **Are requests complete when they reach the team?** Missing identifiers, target values, or approvals can create clarification cycles and delay execution.
- **Are preparation rules reusable?** If each recurring batch is rebuilt from scratch, teams may repeat the same work and introduce avoidable inconsistencies.
- **Can reviewers see what they are approving?** An approval may provide limited control if the reviewer cannot inspect the affected records, proposed values, or validation results.
- **Can the team isolate failed records?** A process that does not distinguish successful and unsuccessful records can create uncertainty during recovery and reruns.
- **Can the team verify the outcome?** A completed execution does not, on its own, demonstrate that all intended records were changed correctly.
- **Can the organization learn from recurring exceptions?** Repeatedly correcting the same issue without changing the process leaves the underlying cause in place.

The answers can help teams set priorities. One workflow may need clearer ownership, while another may need stronger validation or safer retry procedures. Looking at results by process area helps reveal those differences.

## A Practical Maturity Progression

Maturity is not a simple yes-or-no condition. Practices often develop gradually, moving from informal work toward more controlled and measurable processes. A general progression may look like this:

1. **Work depends on individuals:** Requests arrive through different channels, steps are remembered rather than documented, and results are checked inconsistently.
2. **Some practices are repeatable:** Teams use tickets, templates, or known procedures for common situations, but adoption varies by team or data domain.
3. **Standard work is defined:** Responsibilities, approvals, preparation rules, validation steps, and exception handling are documented for the main recurring operations.
4. **Controls are built into the workflow:** Reusable processes guide preparation and execution, reviewers can see the proposed changes, and results and exceptions are captured.
5. **Performance informs improvement:** Teams review measures, such as cycle time, rejection rates, backlog, and first-pass success. They then update rules and processes when recurring issues appear.

This progression is a way to think about process development, not an industry benchmark. Specific maturity descriptions should match the assessment questions and the process being evaluated. For example, the steps needed to make a request more structured differ from those needed to improve batch recovery or access controls.

## Five Areas to Assess in SAP Data Operations

A process-level data maturity assessment should examine the full lifecycle of recurring work. The [SAP Data Operations Health Check](https://migravion.com/sap-data-operations-health-check) uses five areas: Request & Ownership, Preparation & Self-Service, Validation & Approval, Execution & Exceptions, and Governance, Audit & Improvement.

The table below summarizes the practical focus of each area and the evidence teams can review during an assessment.

| **Assessment Area** | **What to Examine** | **Useful Evidence** |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Request & Ownership | How requests are submitted, prioritized, assigned, and tracked | Request forms, tickets, ownership records, approval paths, and status queues |
| Preparation & Self-Service | How data is prepared, rules are reused, and authorized users perform standard work | Templates, [mappings](https://migravion.com/solutions/data-maintenance/visual-data-mapping), [transformation rules](https://migravion.com/solutions/data-maintenance/data-transformation), workflow versions, and role definitions |
| Validation & Approval | How records and business rules are checked and how reviewers assess proposed changes | Validation results, duplicate and reference checks, before-and-after previews, and approval records |
| Execution & Exceptions | How approved changes are applied and how failures, retries, and [reconciliation](https://migravion.com/blog/enterprise-data-reconciliation-automation) are handled | Execution results, row-level errors, retry records, and post-execution comparisons |
| Governance, Audit & Improvement | How access, traceability, performance measurement, and process improvement are managed | Access roles, audit trails, cycle-time measures, rejection rates, and improvement records |

### Request and ownership

The request stage establishes what needs to change, why it is needed, which records are in scope, and who is responsible for each decision. When requests arrive through email, chat, or spreadsheets, important information may be missing or presented differently each time.

Assess whether there is a consistent intake method and whether the process identifies the business or data owner for each recurring operation. Consider whether approvers and responsibilities are documented, and whether teams can track requests from intake to completion.

Prioritization is also part of ownership. Teams need a way to see which requests are waiting, who is handling them, how long they have been open, and what needs escalation. Without that visibility, work may be prioritized through informal follow-ups, rather than agreed criteria.

### Preparation and self-service

Preparation covers how data is selected, checked, [mapped](https://migravion.com/blog/data-mapping-automation), and [transformed](https://migravion.com/blog/sap-data-transformation-guide) before execution. In less repeatable processes, teams may prepare each batch manually, copy values between spreadsheets, or rely on an experienced employee to remember the required steps.

A more controlled approach uses documented rules and reusable templates or workflows for common scenarios. This can reduce repeated setup and make it easier to spot changes in the source data or unresolved exceptions. Reuse should also have ownership: teams need to know which version of a template, mapping, or rule is current.

This area also encompasses self-service. The question is whether authorized business or data management users can execute standard recurring changes within defined controls, or whether each request must wait for SAP IT or a developer. Self-service does not remove the need for technical oversight, but it can give specialists more time to focus on new requirements, platform management, and exceptions.

Teams can also examine how much critical work depends on GUI scripting, RPA, or one-off code. The relevant questions include whether the approach is maintainable, appropriate for the SAP landscape, and aligned with the organization’s upgrade plans.

### Validation and approval

Validation checks whether data meets required conditions before it is applied and whether the resulting change is correct. Depending on the process, checks may cover required fields, allowed values, cross-field rules, duplicates, and the existence of referenced records.

It is useful to ask whether validation follows defined rules and is applied consistently, or relies mainly on manual spot checks. Teams can also consider whether users can preview the records and fields that will change before a bulk update is posted. A clear before-and-after view can help a reviewer understand the actual impact of a change.

Approval is more meaningful when the approver can see what will change and what validation has found. A ticket that says “approved” may provide limited control if the reviewer cannot see the affected records, changed values, or validation results. For higher-impact changes, organizations may also need role separation, risk-based approval, and traceability from request through execution.

### Execution and exceptions

Execution covers how approved changes are applied in SAP and how the process handles failures. Some operations may use manual entry or [spreadsheets](https://migravion.com/blog/excel-to-sap-automation), while others rely on mass transactions, custom programs, controlled bulk tools, or supported APIs. The suitable method depends on the scenario and the organization’s technical and operational requirements.

The process should make clear what happens if a batch only partially succeeds. Can the team see which rows failed and why? Are successful records separated from failed ones? Can failed records be corrected and retried without repeating changes that already succeeded?

Exception handling is a key test of repeatability. If a generic error requires someone to investigate every record manually, the process may be difficult to scale. Clear row-level messages, assigned owners, and a controlled retry method can make failures easier to resolve and reduce uncertainty about what has already changed.

Teams should also ensure that the data SAP actually processed aligns with the changes outlined in the batch. This helps identify omissions or unexpected results, giving the team a basis for sign-off or remediation.

### Governance, audit, and improvement

Governance and audit practices help an organization understand:

- Who prepared, approved, and executed a change
- What values changed
- What happened afterward

Evidence may be spread across requests, emails, SAP logs, files, and local records. The more difficult it is to connect those records, the harder it can be to review a change or investigate a problem.

Assess whether the process retains an end-to-end record of the request, approvals, rule or template version, execution outcome, exceptions, and reconciliation. Also consider whether access controls match responsibilities for preparing, approving, and executing changes.

Measurement and improvement complete the lifecycle. Teams might track cycle time, rejection rates, backlog, or first-pass success for important operations. These measures can help reveal where work is delayed or repeatedly fails. When the same exception occurs again and again, the process should provide a way to update its rules, templates, instructions, or automation backlog.

## Real-World Example: Assessing a Recurring Supplier Update

Consider a recurring bulk change to supplier records. The business requests that a defined group of records receive approved new values.

Looking at the process from beginning to end shows how maturity affects each stage:

- **At intake**: An informal process may accept a spreadsheet with unclear scope and no consistent approval record. A more structured process captures the affected records, target values, reason for the change, requester, owner, and required approval.
- **During preparation**: A manual approach may involve copying values and checking records individually. A repeatable approach uses documented preparation rules, identifies missing or invalid values before execution, and preserves a reviewable version of the prepared batch.
- **Before approval**: A weak process may ask someone to approve the request without showing the exact changes. A stronger process presents the records and proposed values, alongside validation findings, so the approver can understand what will happen.
- **During execution**: A fragile process may provide a general error if some rows fail. A more controlled process identifies failed rows, reports why they failed, and separates them from successful updates.
- **After execution**: A weak process may assume that a completed run means the request is finished. A stronger process compares intended and actual results, resolves exceptions, records the outcome, and captures any follow-up.

The example also shows why a maturity assessment should consider more than the tool used. One team might use automation, but lack clear ownership or reconciliation. Another might perform work manually but have strong approvals and audit records. The assessment should examine how the full process operates.

## How to Conduct a Data Process Maturity Assessment

A useful assessment starts with a defined scope and evidence of actual practice. The goal is to understand how the process works today, including informal steps and exceptions — not only how it is described in a procedure.

The following step sequence can ensure a comprehensive assessment:

1. **Choose the process to assess:** Start with a recurring activity that has meaningful business impact, high volume, frequent delays, or repeated failures. For example, you might assess a monthly bulk update or a recurring data transfer. A specific process gives the assessment a practical focus and makes it easier to identify improvements that matter.
2. **Define the boundaries:** Specify which teams, SAP and non-SAP systems, data domains, and types of changes are included. Clarify whether the assessment covers the standard workflow, exceptions, or both. If one team handles [business partner updates](https://migravion.com/blog/mass-update-sap-business-partner) in several ways, for example, define whether you are assessing one common workflow or comparing those different approaches.
3. **Trace a recent example:** Follow a completed request from intake through preparation, approval, execution, validation, and closure. Include a case that encountered an exception, if possible. Comparing a routine run with a problematic one can reveal where responsibilities, checks, or recovery steps change under pressure.
4. **Review supporting evidence:** Examine artifacts from the process, such as requests, approvals, templates, rule definitions, execution results, validation records, exception logs, and reconciliations. Check whether each item is current and actually used. A procedure stored in a shared folder, for instance, provides weaker evidence of a controlled process if employees follow a different set of steps.
5. **Compare written procedures with actual workflow:** Ask the people involved to describe what they do, including handoffs and workarounds. Compare their accounts with the process documentation and records. Differences can point to outdated procedures, unclear responsibilities, or controls that are difficult to follow in day-to-day work.
6. **Assess each area consistently:** Apply the same scoring criteria across questions and base answers on evidence of current practice. When using a 0–4 scale, choose the option that best represents how the process normally works. Avoid scoring it according to its best individual run or intended future state. If practices vary substantially, record that variation, rather than letting a single score hide it.
7. **Record variation across teams:** Note where practices differ by business unit, data domain, system, or request type. Distinguish a deliberate difference (e.g., an additional approval for a higher-risk change) from an informal workaround used by one team. This helps show whether the organization needs one common process or a targeted improvement in a specific area.
8. **Agree on what the results mean:** Review the findings with the process owner and relevant participants before drawing conclusions. Confirm what each score describes, the evidence that supports it, and which gaps create the greatest operational impact. Then, assign an owner to each priority improvement and identify how the team will tell whether the change has helped.

Taken together, these steps produce an evidence-based view of a defined process, rather than a score detached from its context. Each finding should be traceable to the practice it describes, clarifying which improvements deserve attention.

## How to Interpret Assessment Results

An overall score can provide a concise snapshot, but it should be read alongside results for each area. A stronger score in one dimension can mask a weakness elsewhere. For example, a team may reliably execute changes, yet have limited visibility into request ownership or audit evidence.

The lower-scoring areas can help identify weaknesses and determine where further review is necessary. They do not automatically determine which improvement should come first. A gap affecting a high-impact process may deserve attention before a lower-risk issue, even if both receive similar scores.

For the SAP Data Operations Health Check, each of the 20 questions is scored from 0–4. The overall maximum is 80 points, and each of the five dimensions contributes up to 16 points. These scores can help teams compare their practices across dimensions. They should be interpreted as a structured self-assessment, not an industry benchmark, unless validated comparative data is available.

The score is a starting point for discussion. Teams should review what sits behind it: which practices are consistent, which depend on individuals, and where evidence or controls are missing.

## Turning Findings into an Improvement Plan

An assessment is most useful when teams turn results into manageable actions. Start with gaps that create significant business risk, occur frequently, or affect multiple processes. Then, identify the cause and agree on a change that can be put into practice.

For example, if requests regularly arrive without enough information, the improvement might be to define required fields and a clear intake path. If teams cannot safely retry partially completed batches, they might document which records succeeded and establish a controlled method for reprocessing failures. If approvals do not show the actual change, the team might provide reviewers with the proposed values and validation results.

Each improvement should have an owner and a way to review its effect. Depending on the process, teams might monitor completion time, rejection rate, backlog, first-pass success, or how quickly exceptions are resolved. Reviewing these measures over time helps demonstrate whether the change is working and whether another part of the process needs attention.

A practical improvement plan can be organized around the following three questions:

- **Which gap should we address first?** Consider business impact, frequency, risk, and how many processes are affected.
- **What specific practice will change?** Define a concrete adjustment, such as clearer request requirements, reusable preparation rules, or more informative exception handling.
- **How will we know whether it helped?** Select evidence or measures that show whether the process became more consistent, traceable, or efficient.

## Common Mistakes When Assessing Maturity

A maturity assessment can produce misleading conclusions if its scope or scoring is unclear.

The following potential concerns should be monitored and evaluated:

- **Assessing too much at once:** A review that covers every data capability, process, and team can produce a broad set of findings, without showing which issue matters most. Start with a defined process or domain (e.g., recurring SAP data changes) and expand the scope when the first assessment gives you a clear baseline.
- **Scoring the documented process instead of actual practice:** Written procedures describe the intended workflow, but they may not reflect how requests, approvals, or exceptions are handled day to day. Check process records and talk with the people who perform the work to see whether the documented controls are consistently applied.
- **Using a best-case example:** A successful run or a highly automated team may not represent the usual experience across the process. Base the assessment on typical practice and record meaningful differences by team, data domain, or request type.
- **Treating the total score as the conclusion:** An overall score can conceal important differences between dimensions. For example, repeatable preparation may raise the total, even when approvals, exception handling, or audit records remain weak. Review dimension-level results to see where the process needs attention.
- **Confusing technology with maturity:** Automation, APIs, or a bulk update tool can support repeatability, but their presence does not show that ownership, approval, validation, recovery, and traceability are managed well. Assess how the process works end-to-end, including the controls around its tools.
- **Creating findings without owners:** A list of gaps does not lead to change, unless someone is responsible for addressing each priority. Assign an owner, define the intended process change, and agree on what evidence or measure will show whether the improvement worked.

Avoiding these mistakes helps ensure the assessment reflects how work is actually performed, giving teams a reliable basis for choosing what to improve.

## Assess the Maturity of Your SAP Data Operations

The **SAP Data Operations Health Check** is a focused data process maturity assessment for recurring SAP data work. It contains 20 questions across Request & Ownership, Preparation & Self-Service, Validation & Approval, Execution & Exceptions, and Governance, Audit & Improvement.

Complete the Health Check questionnaire in the link below to receive an overall score, compare results across the five dimensions, and identify the area with the lowest score. Use the results as a structured starting point for discussing current practices and deciding where to focus next.

**[Take the SAP Data Operations Health Check](https://migravion.com/sap-data-operations-health-check).**

## FAQ

- ### What is the difference between a data maturity assessment and a data process maturity assessment?
  
  A data maturity assessment can examine an organization’s broader data capabilities, including strategy, governance, people, technology, and operations. A data process maturity assessment focuses on how consistently a particular type of data-related work is performed. The SAP Data Operations Health Check focuses on recurring SAP data processes.
- ### Is SAP data process maturity the same as SAP data quality?
  
  No. Data quality assesses the condition of the data, while process maturity measures how reliably teams manage the work around that data. Process controls may include checks that help prevent or detect quality problems, but the two assessments answer different questions.
- ### Can maturity differ across SAP teams and processes?
  
  Yes. One team may use consistent approvals and validation, while another relies on manual checks or informal handoffs. Maturity can also differ between types of recurring operations. Assess the process and scope you want to evaluate, rather than assuming one result represents every team.
- ### Who should complete an SAP data operations assessment?
  
  The assessment is most useful when completed by people familiar with how recurring SAP data work is requested, prepared, approved, executed, and reviewed. This may include business or data owners, SAP IT, data management teams, and process specialists. When practices vary, input from more than one role can provide a more complete picture.
- ### How often should organizations reassess SAP data processes?
  
  Reassessment can be useful after significant process, system, or organizational changes, or when recurring issues suggest that existing controls need review. Teams can also revisit the assessment after implementing improvements to see whether practices have changed.

[Education Articles](https://datalark.com/blog/tag/category_education_articles) [Data Quality](https://datalark.com/blog/tag/cases_data_quality) [Data Maintenance](https://datalark.com/blog/tag/cases_data_maintenance)

## Get a trusted partner for successful data migration

[Contact Us](https://migravion.com/contact-us)

[Data Management Platform](https://datalark.com/)

Powered by

<https://leverx.com?utm_source=datalark&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=footer>

![aws-partner-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/aws-partner-icon.svg) ![google-cloud-partner-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/google-cloud-partner-icon.svg) ![sap-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/sap-icon.svg) ![apphaus-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/apphaus-icon.svg) ![microsoft-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/microsoft-icon.svg) ![iso-55001-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/iso-55001-icon.svg) ![iso-22301-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/iso-22301-icon.svg) ![iso-27001-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/iso-27001-icon.svg) ![iso-9001-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/iso-9001-icon.svg) ![aws-partner-network-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/aws-partner-network-icon.svg)

© LeverX Inc. All rights reserved

[![facebook-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/facebook-icon.svg)](https://www.facebook.com/Migravion/) [![linkedin-icon](https://migravion.com/hubfs/footer-images/linkedin-icon.svg)](https://www.linkedin.com/company/migravion) 

[Privacy policy](https://migravion.com/privacy-policy) [Cookie declaration](https://migravion.com/cookie-declaration)

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "WebSite",
  "name" : "Migravion",
  "url" : "https://migravion.com/"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "LocalBusiness",
  "address" : {
    "@type" : "PostalAddress",
    "addressCountry" : "US",
    "addressLocality" : "Miami",
    "addressRegion" : "Florida",
    "postalCode" : "33131",
    "streetAddress" : "801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1970"
  },
  "image" : "https://migravion.com/hubfs/Migravion-logo.svg",
  "name" : "Migravion",
  "telephone" : "+17864645772"
}
```